SaturnFans.com
saturnfans.com - classifieds - forums - webmail


Go Back   SaturnFans.com Forums > Models > Saturn L-Series > L-Series General

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2003, 09:03 PM   #1
socketz
Senior Member
socketz is on a distinguished road
 
socketz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,936
 
Default Positive L Review - ok, it's not new but ...

http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=2

This article just reiterates many of the things us V-6 owners have preached from the get-go.

The car is grossly underrated.

You have to keep this one bookmarked for those times times the Car mags publish reviews of the stripped down 4 cyl models, which is all they seem to ever test anymore.
socketz is offline  
SaturnFans.com Sponsored Links
Old 09-22-2003, 09:12 PM   #2
silverblueL200
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Its nice when you get a reviewer who actually reviews the CAR, not how they FEEL about the car.
 
Old 09-24-2003, 12:43 AM   #3
Stoney
Member
Stoney is on a distinguished road
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 142
Default

This article has been cited as a 'positive' review of Saturn. One editor does pick Saturn as his choice. (Each of 3 other editors picks each of the other cars, the Volvo V40, Jetta and Subaru Imprezza WRX wagons as their picks). But looking at their results makes me think this article is one of the most blatant examples of bias AGAINST Saturn. Taking the "objective" scores (based on track testing and so on) the Saturn would have finished in second place. The description of the car was also fairly gushing over with praise. However the "subjective" ratings were a far different story that guaranteed Saturn's last place. How could Saturn finish in first place in objective braking tests (based on the shortest combined stopping distances from 60 and 80 mph) and still finish second-last in subjective braking? Does it make sense that the car that "handled exceedingly well when compared to the smaller, lighter wagons" would finish last in the subjective handling rating? Saturn also got last place in the following "subjective" categories: Driving excitement, engine, steering, ride, exterior styling, interior styling, seats, and ergonomics/controls (did the DVD system not figure into this? I guess they don't have kids). It got second last in transmission because the auto Subaru was ill fitted to that car's high revving engine. The only "subjective" category Saturn won was luggage space, which wasn't really subjective. I think that the last fair comparison of the Saturn L series was this one from Car and Driver, before it became popular to trash the car: http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=3203
Oh well, what kills our resale doesn't mean we don't love our cars.
Stoney is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just another positive car review!! dartmouthion Astra General 1 03-17-2008 07:40 AM
Another positive review mr weather Aura General 15 05-25-2007 03:27 PM
Another Positive Ion Review Jaseball Ion General 2 03-15-2003 06:05 PM
Another positive review mr weather Ion General 5 10-24-2002 04:53 PM
Very positive VUE review haypops Vue General 0 12-02-2001 10:25 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.

Advanced Forum Search | Advanced Photo Search


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SaturnFans.com. The Saturn Enthusiasts Site.